Legal Opinion

State v. Zgodava

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1986No. C8-85-1710Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

A jury convicted Daniel Zgodava of receiving stolen property, see Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1); § 609.05. On appeal Zgodava contends the admission of his military discharge papers to show he lived in the place where the stolen goods were found was prejudicial error because the papers referred to past criminal activity. He also contends an instruction allowing the jury to convict him if he “had reason to know” the goods were stolen impermissibly dilutes the constitutional requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. TrueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API