Legal Opinion

Banford v. Maroon, No. Spn 9612 25531 Be (Mar. 26, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. SPN 9612 25531 BEUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS The defendant in this summary process action has moved to dismiss the action, and claims that the notice to quit is defective. As a result, the defendant claims, there is no subject matter jurisdiction.

The notice to quit was served on December 10, 1996, and gives as a reason "lapse of time." The quit date of December 19, 1996, is included in the notice to quit. The complaint, served on December 20, 1996, alleges that a lease agreement terminated on November 30, 1996, and that although the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Berlingo v. Sterling Ocean House, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API