Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1934No. Civ. No. 9979Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, J., pro tem.

This is a proceeding in certiorari, and in our view of the case no extended or detailed statement of facts or discussion of law is necessary.

In a pending action to foreclose a mortgage on real property the superior court entered an order appointing an appraiser to appraise the property in question under the *671provisions of section 726 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended in 1933, such appraisement being usable as evidence thereafter at a trial of the case to mark the extreme limit of possible deficiency judgment therein.

A writ of review lies only when the inferior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gumilla v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Holabird v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People ex rel. San Francisco v. County JudgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Sayers v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Howe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API