Legal Opinion

Alderson v. Trent

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 19, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case 50 — ORDINARY APPEAL PROM HENDERSON COURT OP COMMON PLEAS. .Although the bond originally executed may have been defective, it was the duty of the court below to give reasonable time to appellant for the execution of a new bond. (Sec. 682, Civil Code; Waters v. Patrick, 1 Bush, 224.) No brief for appellee.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARGIS

delivered the opinion op the court.

Upon a traverse of an inquisition of forcible entry and •detainer, the appellant executed bond substantially in con*260formity to the provisions of section 463, Civil Code, except the amount of the liability to which the obligors might be. subjected was limited to the sum of one hundred dollars.

On motion of the appellee, the traverse was dismissed because the bond was so limited.

It was a defective bond, for the reason that the costs and damages to which the traverser might be subjected may exceed the sum of $100.

And the law, found in section 463,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Galloway v. BradburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Bays' AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Mayhew v. Kentucky River Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Cox v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Merchants' & Mechanics' Building & Loan Ass'n v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API