Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Samuel M'Neill & Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In error from the Circuit Court of Tishomingo county. Hon. P. T. Scruggs, judge. G. JE. Koolcer, on same side.

1Opinion of the CourtHandy, J.

This action was brought under the Act of 1850, in relation to pleadings, by the defendants in error, against J. Thomas and William L. Duncan,, upon a promissory note made by Thomas, payable to Duncan, by whom it was indorsed to one Stricklin, who indorsed it to the plaintiffs below.

The first objection to the judgment below is, that the court sustained a demurrer to the plea in abatement of the defendant Duncan, setting up that Stricklin, the last indorser of the note, was not sued in the action. There is no error in this. The plaintiff had a perfect right to waive his action against the last…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bates v. StricklandMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Starling v. SorrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Buckingham v. WalkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Martin v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  5. J. S. Hamilton & Co. v. Catchings & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API