Legal Opinion
Shipley v. Orndoff
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 7, 2007No. Civil Action 04-1530-JJFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion For Reconsideration, Motion For Extension Of Time To Amend and Motion To Stay, and Defendants’ Responses. (D.I.42, 52, 53, 54, 56.) Also before the Court are Defendants Verne Orndorff 1 and New Castle County Department of Land Use Office of Code Enforcement’s Motion To Dismiss and Motion To Strike, Plaintiffs Responses and Defendants’ Replies thereto. (D.I.44, 47, 50, 59, 60.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Motion To Dismiss (D.I.44) and deny will all other Motions (D.I.42, 52,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. MeyersDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Daoud v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- EASTMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Evans v. RobertsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Walker v. New Castle CountySuperior Court of Delaware · 2026