Legal Opinion
Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. Dickie
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 16, 2002No. 20249-6-IIIPublished
1Opinion of the Court
43 P.3d 1277 (2002)
111 Wash.App. 209
SUNNYSIDE VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a quasi-municipal Corporation, Respondent,
v.
Dyke DICKIE and Jane Doe Dickie, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 20249-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.
April 16, 2002.
John S. Moore, Jr., Brendan V. Monahan, Velikanje, Moore & Shore, Yakima, for Appellants.
Charles C. Flower, Patrick M. Andreotti, Flower & Andreotti, Yakima, for Respondent.
BROWN, C.J.
Appellant landowners, Dyke and Jane Doe Dickie, argue the trial court erred when (A) applying a right-of-way easement held by the Sunnyside Valley…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.