Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Killian v. Concert Health Plan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 19, 2012No. 11-1112Published

1Concurring in the judgmentPosner, Circuit Judge

I agree with the outcome, and with much of the analysis in the majority opinion. But I disagree that the obligation at issue in the appeal derives from a fiduciary duty. This is really a breach of contract case, and treating it as such not only is the correct approach but simplifies analysis wonderfully.

But before discussing the merits, I want to say a few words about mootness, the subject of a protracted debate between Judges Ripple and Manion. Both quote the standard formula, repeatedly endlessly in cases, that a case is moot if a judgment on the merits in favor of the plaintiff would not…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API