Somers v. McLaughlin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Waulcesha County. Action to recover the purchase price of a horse alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant. The facts appear from the opinion. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant appealed. „
1Opinion of the CourtOetoh, J.
The errors complained of on this appeal would seem to be more of fact than of law. The testimony of the plaintiff was, in effect, that about seven o’clock in the evening of the 3d day of May, 1881, the defendant called upon him, at his house in the city of Milwaukee, and said he understood that he had a horse to sell, which was at the *359farm of plaintiff’s father, in the town of Menomonee, in Waukesha county; that he had seen the mare the day before, and that plaintiff’s brother James was plowing with her, and that she suited him; that he had talked with James about buying her, and that he…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Townsend v. HargravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Magee v. BillingsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- M. T. Bank v. . F. M. Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Sewell v. EatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Fletcher v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ClineDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1885
- Wadhams v. BalfourOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Alexander v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Augusta Cooperage Co. v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- McMillan v. HeapsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.