Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Magoon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1907No. 107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY, OF HAWAII. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a writ of error to review a judgment for the defendants in a suit upon a contract. 16 Hawaii, 332. At the trial a nonsuit was ordered, subject to exceptions taken by the plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was made but was dismissed, and this dismissal also was excepted to. The Supreme Court held that the former exceptions were presented too late, but that the latter was "open and raised the question whether the judgment of nonsuit was right as -matter of law. It discussed this question and sustained the judgment. This was on December 14, 1904. In January, 1905, a petition for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Voorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Harrison v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Southland Industries, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Notley v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API