Percy v. Percy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The dispute in this case is whether thé trial court erred in finding that certain corporate stock owned by the appellee had not appreciated in value at the time of the divorce.
The parties were married in June 1961. At the time, appellee owned 42% of the outstanding capital stock of an irrigation company, Pinal Ditching Company, Inc. Appellee still owns the same stock.
According to his wife the company was primarily successful because appellee spent so much time working at it. Mr. Murray, the company’s accountant, testified the success of the company was due to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Everson v. EversonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- In Re Estate of FrankOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Epstein v. Celotex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
- American Surety Company of New York v. NashArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Whitman v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cockrill v. CockrillArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Baum v. BaumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Smallwood v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992