Legal Opinion
United States v. Carlos C. Vicaria, M.D.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 1992No. 92-2450PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
This case comes before us on the government’s emergency motion to stay district court proceedings pending its appeal of the district court’s grant of a new trial to Carlos Vicaria (“Vicaria”). In our May 14, 1992, order, we determined that the government’s notice of appeal was timely, and we granted the motion for the stay. This opinion follows. We hold that (1) the government’s motion for reconsideration of the district court’s grant of a new trial tolled the time limit for filing a notice of appeal even though the motion was filed before the written order granting the new trial was entered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. John Hitchmon, A/K/A John Ashanti, and Jessie Lee Fussell, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ramon Milian-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Deshawn Travis GloverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Reyes-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Tovar-RicoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Andre Pease, a.k.a., Magic, Beverly Reedy, Latoya PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.