Legal Opinion

Farina v. Lucisano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment for defendant in an action for an injunction to restrain defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s use of a driveway between plaintiff’s and defendant’s houses reversed on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. Findings of fact numbered 3, 4 and 5 are reversed and the conclusions of law are disapproved. Plaintiff’s proposed findings of fact numbered IV, VIH, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII and XIV are found. Defendant obtained title through several mesne conveyances from the first mortgagee, who purchased the property at a foreclosure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wells v. . GarbuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Smith v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Amalgamated Properties, Inc. v. Oakwood Gardens, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API