Legal Opinion

Saylor v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1983No. 861PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting appellee, Raymond Paul Saylor, a new trial. In reviewing the decision of a trial judge to grant a new trial, we may not reverse the trial judge’s order, unless he has committed a clear abuse of discretion or an error of law which necessarily controlled the grant of a new trial. Gilligan v. Shaw, 441 Pa. 305, 272 A.2d 462 (1971); Sindler v. Goldman, 309 Pa.Super. 7, 454 A.2d 1054 (1982). Finding no abuse of discretion or error of law, we affirm.

On November 13, 1975, appellee was involved in an accident along Route 30 near Jenner Township,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Hrivnak v. PerroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. LondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Randolph v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Connolly v. Brink, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1996
  3. Ackerman v. DelcomicoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Ackerman v. DelcomicoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API