Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Saye

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1962No. 39426PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

With reference to the right to recover for ordinary negligence the court charged the jury that “Where a share-the-expense ride in a motor vehicle is prearranged by a legally enforceable agreement, such a situation makes the passenger a passenger for hire and not a guest, and requires ordinary care.” The evidence did not authorize a finding that there was a prearrangement, either express or implied, of a duty on the part of the deceased to share the expenses of the fatal trip. There was no express promise to do- so nor any facts from which an implied obligation could be inferred.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Pressley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Wynes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Rogers v. SayeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API