Rogers v. Saye
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
With reference to the right to recover for ordinary negligence the court charged the jury that “Where a share-the-expense ride in a motor vehicle is prearranged by a legally enforceable agreement, such a situation makes the passenger a passenger for hire and not a guest, and requires ordinary care.” The evidence did not authorize a finding that there was a prearrangement, either express or implied, of a duty on the part of the deceased to share the expenses of the fatal trip. There was no express promise to do- so nor any facts from which an implied obligation could be inferred.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Pressley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Wynes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Rogers v. SayeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962