Legal Opinion

AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1934No. 6330, 6331Published

1Opinion of the Court

73 F.2d 531 (1934)

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION

v.

PETROLEUM IRON WORKS CO. OF OHIO.[*]

PETROLEUM IRON WORKS CO. OF OHIO

v.

A. O. SMITH CORPORATION.

Nos. 6330, 6331.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 10, 1934.

George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill., and A. C. Paul, of Minneapolis, Minn. (Maxwell & Ramsey, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Paul, Paul & Moore, of Minneapolis, Minn., E. A. Andrus and P. O. Dunham, both of Milwaukee, Wis., and M. K. Hobbs, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for A. O. Smith Corporation.

A. B. Stoughton, of Philadelphia, Pa. (John Walsh, James A. Richmond, and Louis A. Spiess, all of…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API