Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 3, 1983No. B14-82-437CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from the declaratory judgment of the probate court that the appellants’ interests under a will had been forfeited under an in terrorem clause. We reverse.

Vivian Kent Vilven, the testatrix of the will in question, died on December 14,1978, leaving a total gross estate in excess of $900,000.00. Her closest relatives were her nephew, Carl Kenneth Sheffield, and her niece, Beverly Sheffield Tipton. Appellee had been Vilven’s attorney for some time and had prepared her will. The will provided that after specific bequests were satisfied, the appellants…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Estate of FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Sheffield v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. In re the Estate of CroninNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McLendon v. McLendon, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  2. In Re Estate of Schiwetz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  3. Ferguson v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Marion v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  5. In Re the Estate of Hamill, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API