Wincel v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
This is an appeal from a conviction of the appellant of second degree burglary. The only question raised on appeal is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the finding of guilty, and this centers about the fact that the testimony of the accomplice was the only evidence that implicated the appellant. The accomplice, Thomas Cook, gave his age as 16 years and that he lived at the Father Gibault’s School for Boys at the time of the trial. He testified that he and the appellant planned the burglary of an Indianapolis public school; that he went to the appellant’s home on December 7, 1966,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Ponos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Bush v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Rice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Taflinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Eskridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Eskridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.