Legal Opinion
Steele v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1523PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
' Currently before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration [56]' of the Court’s Order and Memorandum Opinion [54, 55] granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs’ motion for class certification [46]. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion, defendant’s response [59], plaintiffs’ reply [60], defendant’s notice of supplemental authority [61] and plaintiffs’ response to that authority [62], along with the applicable law and the entire record herein, the Court will GRANT plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Benoit v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Garza v. HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Afghan and Iraqi Allies v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Healthy Futures of Texas v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Padgett v. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.