Englebrick v. Worthington Industries, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: In Chambers: Order Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendants’ Motion to Compel Responses to Deposition Questions
MARC L. GOLDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff Bradley Englebrick’s responses to certain deposition questions. Argument on the motion was held on October 20, 2009. Supplemental letter briefs were filed on October 21, 2009, and the matter is ready for decision.
This is a product liability action arising from a fire at Plaintiffs’ home on April 7, 2008. Plaintiffs claim that a gas cylinder and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jane Doe, a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian and Mother, Alisa Rudy-Glanzer v. Elroy "Bud" Glazer, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Master Key Litigation. States of Illinois, and v. Edward H. McCulloch Witness-Appellee AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,166, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1915, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2681 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael J. Colello, Cross Financial Svc., Inc. Owen R. Fox Carroll E. Siemens Bruce Franklin Douglas S. CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Kevin William DurnellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020