Legal Opinion

George v. Cleveland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1898No. 7775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Buffalo county. Tried below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

This action was instituted by defendant in error for himself and others similarly interested to restrain the issuance and delivery of the bonds of the village of Shelton, Nebraska, in the aggregate sum of $2,000, to Jason George and Thomas Turney. Pleadings were filed by the parties, by which issues were joined, of which a trial resulted in a decree by which the delivery of said bonds was perpetually enjoined and restrained. Prom such decree the present appeal has been perfected.

It appears that George and Stevens submitted for the consideration of the citizens of Shelton the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. HurlburtNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. State ex rel. St. Joseph & Denver City Rld. v. Comm'rs of Nemaha CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. Nash v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Nash v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State ex rel. Gardner v. RoggenNebraska Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MacLeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brooks v. MacLeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API