Legal Opinion

Brooks v. MacLean

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1914No. 17,289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dawson county: Bruno O. Hostetler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, for himself and in behalf of all other taxpayers similarly situated, for the purpose of enjoining the issuance and delivery of certain precinct bonds voted by Riverside precinct of Dawson county to aid in building a bridge across the Platte river. The defendants are the board of county commissioners of Dawson county and the Riverside Bridge Company, the proposed donee of the bonds. The principal reasons given in the petition to show that the bonds were illegal are: (1) Illegality in the formation of the precinct; (2) that the petition for the calling…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wullenwaber v. DuniganNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Green v. Lancaster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State ex rel. Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad v. BabcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Morton v. CarlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Nash v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lang v. Sanitary District of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ahern v. Richardson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lewis v. EyerlyNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API