Moore v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Reversing.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny and sentenced to serve one year in the penitentiary.
We are of opinion that his motion for a peremptory instruction should have been sustained. The only evidence introduced was that of the commonwealth. It proved by Mr. J. S. Berry that in October, 1927, he bought a new Oldsmobile sedan; that in the early part of November, while it was parked on a street of Central City, it was -stolen by some one; that the next he saw it was when it was found in a ditch beside a road near G-reenville. When…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pardue v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bullock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Tarkaney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- State v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Lynch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- State v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.