Bullock v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
This is a second appeal of this case. Bullock v. Com., 241 Ky. 799, 45 S. W. (2d) 449, 450. The facts as proven on the first trial are recited in our former opinion. The evidence that the bloodhound followed the trail from the scene of the murder to the accused’s home, and also certain statements of deceased, were held improperly admitted.
Respecting the evidence as to the bloodhound following the trail from the scene of the murder to the accused’s home, it is stated in our former opinion, “Upon another trial, evidence may be introduced to prove…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Blair v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Mullins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Cornett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Barton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Shelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Vincent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Terrell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CollinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. NorwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.