Legal Opinion
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 30, 2016No. A14-413PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Respondent Jerry Expose, Jr. brought a civil action against appellant Thad Wilder-son & Associates, P.A. (the clinic) and appellant Nina Mattson (collectively appellants), asserting claims for unlawful disclosure of health records under the Minnesota Health Records Act, §§ 144.291-.298 (2014), invasion of privacy, vicarious liability, and negligent supervision. Appellants jointly moved for judgment on the pleadings, and the district court dismissed the claims. As ■ relevant here, the .district court ruled that appellants are immune from liability under Minn.Stat. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Matthis v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGuire v. BowlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Jordan L. Oslund v. The Paint Genie, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- Laurissa Wredberg v. Canvas Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2026