Legal Opinion

Gurganious v. Integon General Ins. Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1992No. 915SC1060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant argues that since a UIM insurance carrier’s liability is derivative of the primary tort-feasor’s liability, and the action against the primary tort-feasor was dismissed with prejudice, the present action is barred by res judicata. However, our Supreme Court has held that a final judgment between the primary tort-feasor and plaintiff does not necessarily bar a subsequent claim against the UIM carrier. Silvers v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., 324 N.C. 289, 378 S.E.2d 21 (1989).

As defendant properly points out, the Silvers decision was based upon the 1983 version of N.C. Gen.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. NC Farm Bureau, Mut. Ins. Co. v. BostCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Spivey v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Williams v. HolsclawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Wilmoth v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API