Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sepulveda v. Haley

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1870No. 2166Published

APPEAL from Seventeenth Judicial District, Los Angeles County.

1Dissent

TEMPLE, J.-

— I dissent, and intend on some future occasion to express my opinion more fully.

TEMPLE, J., Dissenting. — This action is brought under the two hundred and fifty-fourth section of the Practice Act to quiet the title of plaintiff to three tracts of land, each being part of the San Vicente Rancho in Los Angeles county.

The plaintiff proved title under the grant, and, as to possession, that one tract had been entirely inclosed by her grantor, and was so inclosed at the time it was conveyed to her, which was about eight,months before the commencement of this action, since which time the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Smith v. McConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Lyle v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Pralus v. Jefferson Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API