Legal Opinion

Hailey v. City of Newark

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 7, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hartshorne, C. P. J.

The proceedings in the two above cases' are each brought under the mob violence statutes, more specifically under article 2 covering not only damage to property, but injury to the person, or loss of life by lynching. (R. S. 2:63-10, 11; N. J. S. A. 2:63-10, 11.) These latter sections refer to, and are defined by, the penal provisions covering mobs. (R. S. 2:152-1-3; N. J. S. A. 2:152-1-3.) Defendant, the City of Newark, first moved to strike the original complaints herein, both on the ground that the statutes were unconstitutional and that the complaints did not set forth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. SturgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  3. Green v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Lexa v. ZmuntOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Shake v. Board of Commissioners of Sullivan CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AlgorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. A & B AUTO STORES v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Slaton v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API