Legal Opinion

Jones v. Oz-Ark-Val Poultry Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1957No. 5-1295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam RobissoN, Associate Justice.

This case involves the right to the use of subterranean waters by adjoining-landowners. Appellant, Paul Jones, and his wife, El-wanda Jones, own a small parcel of land on which they live, near Bloomer, Arkansas, and the appellant, Mrs. Laura Ward, owns and lives on an adjoining small acreage. The appellee, A. T. Crouch Creamery Company, owns land adjacent to the Jones and Ward lands. In the years 1954 and 1955 the appellees drilled water wells on the Crouch property, and the water from these wells was conveyed by a pipe line to chicken processing plants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hudson v. DaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Harris v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Harrell v. City of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Maddocks v. GilesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. South Flag Lake, Inc. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Lingo v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  5. Jones v. Oz-Ark-Val Poultry Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API