Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vito M. DeStefano, J.

Introduction

Motion by the plaintiffs, William Morrison and Charles Kist, for: (1) leave to amend their verified class action complaint, and (2) further relief amending the caption so as to remove therefrom co-plaintiff William Morrison, inasmuch as he is no longer a shareholder of the defendant corporation, The Main Celestial Group, Inc., is granted in part and denied in part.

Cross motion by the defendants for an order pursuant to, inter alia, CPLR 3211 (a) (7) dismissing the verified complaint is granted.

Factual and Procedural Background

In November…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API