Legal Opinion

Joshua Gonzales v. Connie Gipson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 2017No. 13-56498UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Judge Callahan votes to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The memorandum disposition and dissent filed August 11, 2016, is withdrawn. A memorandum disposition shall be filed concurrently with this order. With the filing of the new memorandum disposition, the parties shall be allowed to file petitions for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc.

SO ORDERED.

MEMORANDUM *

Joshua Joel Zamora Gonzales (“Gonzales”) appeals the district court’s denial of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Juan H. v. Walter Allen IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Gregory LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Victor Manuel Solis v. Rosie GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Juan Carlos Bautista-Avila, United States of America v. Gabriel Figueroa-Levya, United States of America v. Jorge Armenta-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Gonzales v. California Victim Compensation Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API