Legal Opinion
In Re Jason P.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 25, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
At the present time, the court must decide whether a paternal grandmother should be permitted to intervene as a party in petitions for neglect and for the termination of parental rights after her son, the child's father, consented to a termination of his parental rights. No Connecticut cases appear to have considered this question, which was belatedly injected into the case.
I
The following chronological summary puts the claim for intervention into proper perspective. The two petitions were filed simultaneously pursuant to General Statutes § 17-43a (e) by the commissioner of the department of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Nye v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- In the Interest of J. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bridgeman v. RagagliaConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
- In re Riley B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022