Haynes v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Conviction of shooting at another; from Appling superior court —Judge Highsmith. June 17, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial, not being referred to in the brief of counsel, will be treated as abandoned. There was no error in the refusal of the court to allow the defendant to show by testimony ¿>f the prosecutor, whom the defendant was charged with having shot, and who *742had testified to his recognition of the defendant as the person who did the shooting (which took place at night), that the witness “was shot by another party, and very much under the same circumstances, near the same locality, in the same town,” and that the witness “had every reason in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilensky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Levining v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- McCrory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Saylors v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Key v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Norwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Slappey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.