Legal Opinion

Herold v. East Coast Scaffolding, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant U.S. Capital Insurance is obligated to indemnify the defendant-respondent East Coast Scaffolding, Inc., in an action brought by the plaintiffs Richard Herold and Bridget Herold, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated November 18, 1992, which granted the motion of U.S. Capital Insurance for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On April 24, 1991, the plaintiff Richard Herold, a construction project supervisor, was injured on a work site when certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Winstead v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilner v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. U.S. Underwriters Insurance v. Congregation B'nai IsraelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Dutkanych v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Nicosia v. ShultisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API