Mullins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for theft; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
We cannot agree to the contention that the evidence is not sufficient. By two witnesses the state showed the movements of two men, one of whom looked like appellant, whose dress was described as a sheep lined coat, having on military boots and boot pants, being bareheaded. The car alleged to have been stolen was parked in a driveway some few feet away from a street toward which the driveway sloped. Near midnight on the date alleged the two men referred to appeared first on foot, and then in a car, passing and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Douglas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Polanco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Martindale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Cates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.