Christ v. Brontman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas A. Standee, J.
The defendants, Manuel Brontman and Muriel Brontman, submit a motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint and canceling the lis pendens pursuant to CPLR 6514, and seeking sanctions against the plaintiffs for bringing a frivolous lawsuit and for abuse of process.
The plaintiffs, Charles Christ and Anne Christ, submit a cross motion seeking an order granting plaintiffs summary judgment against defendants, and awarding specific performance to the plaintiffs.
“Any party may move for summary judgment in any action, after issue has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Satterly v. PlaistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Satterly v. PlaistedNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Nelson v. RingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Regional Gravel Products, Inc. v. StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Rieter v. TavellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Avery v. ZahmNew York Supreme Court · 1998