Legal Opinion

Avery v. Zahm

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas A. Stander, J.

The plaintiffs, Gregory Avery and Sundae Avery (Avery), submit this motion seeking summary judgment against the defendants, Raymond E. Zahm and Carol B. Zahm (Zahm), on plaintiffs’ first cause of action for specific performance of a purchase and sale contract for residential property.

The defendant, Re/Max Results, Inc. (Re/Max), submits a motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to the defendant, Re/Max Results, Inc.

FACTS

The purchase and sale contract of the parties was entered into on May 1, 1998, when the plaintiff buyers Avery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Satterly v. PlaistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Nelson v. RingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Regional Gravel Products, Inc. v. StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Rieter v. TavellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Pepitone v. SofiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steven G. Walther, Inc. v. TarantoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API