Legal Opinion

Central Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Roeser

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1926No. 16919. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

On November 9, 1921, the Central Bond and Mortgage Company, a corporation, brought an action in the municipal court of Chicago against John Roeser claiming damages for an alleged breach of contract. Summons was served and the defendant filed an appearance and demand for a jury trial and an affidavit of merits denying liability and claiming the benefit of the Statute of Frauds. When the case was called for trial on March 26, 1923, the defendant failed to appear, evidence was introduced, and the jury was instructed to return a verdict for the plaintiff for $1160. Judgment was rendered on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Weisguth v. Supreme Tribe of Ben HurIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cramer v. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Harris v. Chicago House Wrecking Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Pisa v. RezekIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Waite v. BristowIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Boyle v. Veterans Hauling LineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  3. Trisko v. Vignola Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Wierzbicki v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. The People v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API