Legal Opinion

Claude v. Claude

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is an appeal from the decree entered after a hearing in the above entitled matter directed by our decision on the first appeal (Claude v. Claude, 180 Or. 62, 174 P 2d 179).

In that appeal this eourt granted defendant a divorce from plaintiff but reversed the lower court *314“for failure to give the plaintiff appropriate relief under the contract of March 13, 1944,” and remanded the cause for such further proceedings. Claude v. Claude, supra at page 85. The Mandate on that decision was filed January 6,1947, and thereafter an accounting was had which resulted in a decree on September 7, 1949,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Flower v. BarnekoffOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. FOUCHEK v. JanicekOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Preston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Marlin Ferris Goggans, Also Known as M. F. Goggans v. Reta OsbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Timmermann v. TimmermannOregon Supreme Court · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API