Williams v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Piper and Wheeler, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the claim in the following memorandum: We think the finding of the Court of Claims that the State was negligent is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. Further we find no competent evidence in this record that Kennedy “ by use of force, threats and duress, compelled ” decedent Williams “ to drive and transport said William A. Kennedy in attempting to perfect his escape.” In any event we think that the rule laid down in Mitchell v. Rochester Ry. Co.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Comstock v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spangberg v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Spangberg v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955