Pope v. Pope
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. The order and judgment of the trial court, refusing to dismiss the interventions and to declare the intervenors forever barred from asserting any interest in the property involved in the litigation, was not a final disposition of the cause, and would not have been final as to any of the plaintiffs in error if it had been rendered as contended by them. In either event, the main case would, as to them, still be pending in the trial court. Therefore, the writ of error must be dismissed as being prematurely brought to this court. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-701; Johnson v. Holmes,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ray v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Johnson v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Bagley v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Jackson v. FiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brookshire Ex Rel. Brookshire v. RetzMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Manion v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963