Legal Opinion

Danker v. Dowd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1951No. 28,843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, J.

The above named “Relator” has filed his petition in triplicate in this court, (pro se) seeking to mandate the respondents to produce certified copies of all proceedings and procedure with respect to a certain charge of parole violation etc.

We have not issued an alternative writ to the respondents and of course they have not appeared in the action.

The action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the petitioner as required by the statute, §3-2201, Burns’ 1946 Replacement. It is not possible legally for an action of mandate to be prosecuted by one in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Young v. NiblackIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rogers v. Youngblood, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Board of Public Safety v. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Meek v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pembleton v. McManamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tomlinson v. JeffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State Election Board v. Johnson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API