Legal Opinion
Volivar v. . Cedar Works
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 27, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER and MANNING, JJ., concurring, except as to the retroactive effect of the decision. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court byAssociate Justice Brown. The defendant is a foreign corporation owning property and doing business in this State prior to the act complained of and up to this time.
The alleged damage occurred in 1904, and this action was commenced 12 November, 1908. The defendant at all times maintained a process agent in the State, upon whom service could be had, and upon (657) whom service actually was had in the case now being considered. The defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
- Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Huss v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John J. Ryan v. John Brooks, and Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., John J. Ryan v. John Brooks, and Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- Duke University v. ChestnutCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Roess v. Malsby Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Smith v. Finance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934