Legal Opinion

Rogren v. Corwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wexford; Lamb, J. Proceedings by James Whaley, highway commissioner, to lay out a highway. On appeal by Mary Cor-win, one of the defendants, to the township board, the judgment of said commissioner establishing such highway was reversed and Enoch Rogren, one of the petitioners, appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for petitioners. Defendant Corwin brings error. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In March, 1911, a petition was filed with, the highway commissioner for the laying out of a highway. The plat will help to explain the situation.

*55The necessary notices were given, and a hearing had, and the highway commissioner found that the proposed highway was a public necessity, and awarded damages. The defendant appealed to the township board, which board reversed the decision of the highway commissioner, and an appeal was then taken to the circuit court. The case was tried by a jury. It was shown that the village of Hobart was a railroad station, and that in the village were the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Paul v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Commissioners of Parks & Boulevards v. MoestaMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Fields v. ColbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Novi v. Robert Adell Children's Funded TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Novi v. Robert Adell Children's Funded TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Novi v. Robert Adell Children's Funded TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API