Wayne County v. Hathcock
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeaver, J.
I concur with the majority’s result and decision to overrule Poletown Neighborhood Council v Detroit, 410 Mich 616; 304 NW2d 455 (1981), but do so for my own reasons.1
The Michigan Constitution states:
Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation therefor being first made and *486secured in a manner prescribed by law .... [Const 1963, art 10, § 2.]
Proper application of the art 10, § 2’s “public use” limitation on the exercise of eminent domain requires that the Court abandon Poletown’s holding that land can be taken by the government and transferred to a private…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Phillips v. Mirac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.