Barker v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Robert Barker appeals his conviction of perjury 1, a Class D felony. Barker contends that an automobile engine does not meet Indiana’s statutory definition of a motor vehicle. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction.
*728We reverse.
In July 1992 Barker pled guilty to possessing, with intent to sell, an automobile engine with an obliterated vehicle identification number in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2321. In May 1994, twenty-three months later, Barker applied to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles for renewal of his business license as an automobile…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Indiana Department of Human Services v. FirthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Detterline v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Davidson v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tucker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- United States v. Orville Leon PayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitfield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Brett Conover v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- C v. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jeremy R Basso v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2024