Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Dreher

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur, J.

There was held at Audubon, Iowa, by the Audubon County Pure Bred Live Stock Association, a brood *179sow sale. It was what was termed ‘ ‘ a combination sale, ’ ’ — that is, different breeders combined their offerings at the sale. The sale was had as a brood sow sale, according to a printed catalogue. The sow in controversy was owned by defendant, and was bought by plaintiff at the sale for $97.50, which price was paid in cash.

The petition was in two counts. Count 1 alleged an express warranty of the sow purchased by plaintiff, the warranty being:

“Every sow guaranteed to be with pig. Should any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conkling v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Bucy v. Pitts Agricultural WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Parsons Band Cutter & Self Feeder Co. v. MallingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. George E. Pew Co. v. Karley & TitsenorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  3. Mousel v. WidickerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. Davenport Ladder Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API