Legal Opinion
Troncatti v. Smereczniak
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 28, 1967No. Appeals, 9 and 10PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
The plaintiff, Vincent P. Troncatti, while working as a flagman on the highway for the Pennsylvania Department of Highways, was struck and injured by an automobile operated by the defendant. He sued for damages and at trial the jury awarded him $9,846.94. The defendant filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. In support of the last mentioned motion, the following reasons were assigned: “1. The verdict was against the evidence. *92. The verdict was against the weight of the evidence. 3. The verdict was against the law. 4. The verdict…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- May Department Stores Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Gregorius v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Berkeihiser v. DIBARTOLOMEROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Nakles v. Union Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Farrar v. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- GAGLIANO v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Albert v. AlterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.