Legal Opinion

Weitz Co. v. Heth

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 26, 2013No. 1 CA-CV 11-0788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 The question we address is whether Arizona’s statutory provision governing the priority of mechanics’ liens (Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) section 33-992(A)) permits a court to shift lien priorities by applying the doctrine of equitable subrogation. Because § 33-992(A) expressly provides that mechanics’ liens have priority over all subsequent encumbrances (subject to a narrow exception not applicable here), we hold that allowing a subsequent lienholder to equitably subrogate its loan to a position ahead of a mechanic’s lien would contravene the plain statutory…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weitz Co. v. HethArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. The Weitz Company v. Nicholas HethArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  3. The Weitz Company v. Nicholas HethArizona Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API