Ballanger v. Johanns
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff John Ballanger, Jr. (“Ballan-ger”), sought judicial review of a ruling by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) in which the USDA found Ballanger converted wetlands for agricultural use in violation of 16 U.S.C. §§ 3801, 3821-24, and thereby became ineligible to receive certain USDA benefits. The matter was fully briefed, argued, and submitted to the district court, 1 and the district court refused to disturb the agency’s decision. Ballanger appeals, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. Background
Ballanger lives in Iowa and owns…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michael Nack v. Douglas WalburgCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. J & K Market Centerville, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Care Net Pregnancy Center v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- B & D Land and Livestock Co. v. SchaferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Anderson v. Farm Service Agency of United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.